Based on the discussions in the LightZone forum and my own experiments I found that histogram ≠ histogram.
I created in DPP a slightly processed JPG of the same image I used in my previous post. I opened then the JPG image both in DPP and LZ and the RGB histograms were different even the images looked the same. I had earlier assumed that the differences in the histograms were caused by different processing of the raw image, but that is not true. The histograms don't visualize the same thing!
|
|
Canon Digital Photo Professional |
LightZone |
I found a piece of software
ImageJ that has an option to copy-paste the channel histogram data into Excel. I then generated a simple channel intensity vs. pixel count chart and that corresponds quite well with the DPP histogram. It looks like the scaling of the y-axis in DPP is not linear, e.g. the first peak in blues is about a third of the highest peak in DPP but in Excel it's about two thirds (200k vs 320k). I tried to change the x-axis to logarithmic so that I could have produced the histogram in LZ, but the result wasn't the same. I guess LZ shows some kind of luminosity vs. channel intensity histogram as the x-axis would indicate.
|
Linear and logarithmic histograms generated in Excel |
No comments:
Post a Comment